Updated 27 April 2007
Return to Introduction to Film syllabus
English 114: Introduction to Film, Section
2, Spring 2007
EXTRA-CREDIT PAPER FILM ANALYSIS ASSIGNMENT
(Due no later than
April 30)
For extra credit you may submit a 1750 word paper (about 7 typewritten pages) that meets the criteria below. Any paper that meets these criteria will automatically add 15 points to your final grade point total. Any paper that I judge to be superior will be awarded an additional 5 points.
A paper that does not meet the criteria below will not receive credit, but it will not count against your final grade. Papers that do only a partial job of analysis will receive no credit.
A successful paper (worth 15 points) is one that:
- is well-organized
- has coherent, well-formed paragraphs
- defines terms being used
- offers specific examples of techniques being discussed
- meets all other criteria below
A superior paper (worth 20 points) is one that does all of these things in a way that is especially original, clear, and compelling and is mostly free of errors in grammar, spelling and mechanics.
Any paper that is plagiarized in part or in whole will receive no credit. The University Policy on Academic Honesty in The Basic Stuff Student Handbook defines "plagiarism" in this way:
Plagiarism
Submission of an academic assignment as one's own work, which includes critical ideas or written narrative that are taken from another author without the proper citation. This does not apply only to direct quotes, but also to critical ideas that are paraphrased by the student. The following examples are all acts of plagiarism:
- submitting the work of others as your own
- submitting others' work as your own with only minor changes
- submitting others' work as your own without adequate footnotes, quotations, and other reference forms
- multiple submission of the same work, written or oral, for more than one course without both instructor's permission, or making minor revisions on work which has received credit and submitting it again as new work.
If you have any questions about what constitutes plagiarism or how to avoid it, contact me!
| 1. Subject | 2. First Paragraph | 3. Second Paragraph | 4. Main Body |
| 5. Conclusion | 6. Format | 7. Sources and Plagiarism | 8. Hints and Warnings |
|
Recommended Films: Almost any mainstream narrative fiction film can be analyzed for this paper, but I do strongly recommend that you see the film more than once--preferably 3 or 4 times. The MSU library's Educational Resource Center has a wide array of U.S. and foreign films available on DVD. You can find additional information about many of these films on the Internet Movie Database (http://www.imdb.com). If you have any doubts about your choice of film, please contact me (donald.larsson@mnsu.edu).
|
|||
1.
SUBJECT
|
| 2. FIRST PARAGRAPH The first paragraph of your paper should contain a brief summary of the film's narrative ("story") (about 100-150 words). Tell us what happens in the film. This should be in your own words. Do not repeat descriptions from other sources. return to criteria list |
| 3. SECOND PARAGRAPH The second paragraph of your paper should explain how the film's "plot" differs from its "story," as defined in Chapter 2 of Looking at Movies (about 150-250 words). Tell us how the events of the narrative are arranged and presented in the film itself. You should pay special attention to how the use of time differs between story and plot (order, duration, frequency). return to criteria list |
| 4.
MAIN BODY The main body of your paper (1450 words--about 5-6 typewritten pages) should analyze the use of
(Choose only one of these elements for analysis! Do not mix them!)
|
A.
If you analyze MISE-EN-SCENE (drawing upon terms and concepts from Chapter
3 in Looking at Movies): Discuss how the design elements of setting, costumes and make-up, lighting,
movement and acting, and the use of space affect our perceptions of
the film's narrative, characters, and/or meanings. Be sure to define or explain the
terms you use and give specific examples from individual scenes in
the film.. Some questions to consider include the following:
Note: Deal only with those questions (and others you might think of) that are relevant to the scenes being discussed in the film you are analyzing. |
B:
If you analyze CINEMATOGRAPHY (drawing upon terms and concepts from Chapter
4 in Looking at Movies): Discuss how framing and camera movement, as well as
other choices by the cinematographer affect our perceptions of the film's narrative,
characters, and/or meanings. You may consider aspects of lighting
here as well. Be sure to define or explain the terms you use. Some
questions to consider include the following:
Again, deal only with those questions that are relevant to the scenes being discussed. REMINDER: Discuss either
mise-en-scene or cinematography. Do not attempt to do both! Do not attempt to cover
every single example or possible question. Pick a few scenes and discuss them in detail or
discuss significant aspects of the major areas or mise-en-scene or cinematography. |
| 5. CONCLUSION Your final paragraph (up to 200 words) should discuss some of the kinds of meanings (referential, explicit, implicit and/or symptomatic) conveyed by the film and offer some conclusions about how mise-en-scene or cinematography conveys or affects those meanings. Be sure to define or explain the terms you use. return to criteria list |
6.
FORMAT
|
| 7. SOURCES AND PLAGIARISM The paper should reflect your own analysis of the film in your own words. I do not expect you to use any outside sources. If you do use any sources for words or ideas, you must give them full credit in footnotes or endnotes. If the
paper or any part of it is copied from another source, it will not receive any credit.
You may view and discuss a film with other students, but you are all
responsible for putting the paper into your own individual words. If
you have any questions about what constitutes plagiarism, please
check with me! |
8.
HINTS AND WARNINGS
|